Author Archives: notsomeritorios

The Economic Survey talks about how India need to focus more on Poverty Reduction than curbing Inequality. It argues that sustained Economic Growth will lead to increase in purchasing capacity of those in the bottom quintile of income distribution and thus help in lifting people out of poverty.

This is a standard Trickle Down argument. The survey claims that high inequality is co related with lower levels of socio economic indicators in developed economies like USA and UK.

But in the case of India high inequality correlates with higher levels of socio economic indicators like health, education and Life expectancy. The survey thus is of the view that Economic Growth should be the prime focus of Indian Economy and redistribution of unequal resources a later goal. The idea being to focus on increasing the share of the pie rather than redistribution of the existing pie.

What is puzzling is that it is not known if the socio-economic indicators associated with increased inequality in India are distributed evenly or are limited to a certain section of Indian population.The survey anecdotes China as a nation which has seen a massive rise in Inequality associated with massive reduction in poverty. Citing China’s example the focus is put on economic growth.But Economic Growth is invisible in india. This comparison of China is unjust. China has around half of its workforce in informal sectors of economy, whereas India has around 90 percent of its workforce enagaged in Informal economy.India’s growth is stagnated because more than half of India’s GDP is contributed to by the informal sector which grows with minimal govt support. The formal sector is not strong enough to maintain a growth that will trickle down and lead to improvement in conditions of masses. In China, the informal Economy contributes a mere 22 percent to their GDP and the formal sector is heavily industrialised and this along with a booming service sector leads to stupendous economic growth.Whereas in india much of the growth is dependent on service economy, and the industrial sector is apparently not that strong as China.On the other hand such a growth is a prime example of a neoliberal plutocracy where the Ambani’s and Adani’s wealth grows in leaps and bounds and there is no trickling down.The Economic Survey thus is a very sly attempt to keep the poor, poor and the rich richer. Something called as Sado Populism where in the Charismatic leader promises the people “Growth”, “Development” ‘Vikas” but they are seldom part of that Growth and thus the discontent brews among them. But this is balanced by the Frenzied Religious Nationalism and the economy keeps growing albeit with increasing Inequality.

It is usual to hear all those who feel moved by the deplorable condition of the Untouchables unburden themselves by uttering the cry “We must do something for the Untouchables”. One seldom hears any of the persons interested in the problem saying ‘Let us do something to change the Touchable Hindu’. It is invariably assumed that the object to be reclaimed is the Untouchables. If there is to be a Mission, it must be to the Untouchables and if the Untouchables can be cured, untouchability will vanish. Nothing requires to be done to the Touchable. He is sound in mind, manners and morals. He is whole, there is nothing wrong with him. Is this assumption correct? Whether correct or not, the Hindus like to cling to it. The assumption has the supreme merit of satisfying themselves that they are not responsible for the problem of the Untouchables. “

• Dr BR Ambedkar in Untouchables or The Children of India’s Ghetto

Recently the Supreme Court of India observed that criminal proceedings arising out of Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities Act), 1989 can be quashed invoking powers under Article 142 of Constitution or Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code.

The mere fact that the offence is covered under a ‘special statute’ would not refrain this Court or the High Court from exercising their respective powers under Article 142 of the Constitution or Section 482 CrPC, a three judges bench headed by CJI NV Ramana observed.

Such quashing powers, according to the court, can be invoked in these two situations:

1.  Where it appears to the Court that the offence in question, although covered under the SC/ST Act, is primarily private or civil in nature, or where the alleged offence has not been committed on account of the caste of the victim, or where the continuation of the legal proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law, the Court can exercise its powers to quash the proceedings.

2.  When considering a prayer for quashing on the basis of a compromise/settlement, if the Court is satisfied that the underlying objective of the Act would not be contravened or diminished even if the felony in question goes unpunished.

The Supreme Court bench has made a grave error in the above judgement by opining that if the crime under SC ST PoA Act is Civil or Private in nature, it has the constitutional right to quash the proceedings.

Such a judgement points to the limited understanding of the judges of the Supreme Court in reference to crimes committed against SC ST (read Untouchables). In the Hindu society, Untouchables have been subjected to the ignominy of various kinds and such treatment continues unabashedly even today.

It should be noted here that casteist slang and abuses are used in a derogatory sense against members of the SC-ST community, violates their human dignity and erase their recognition as a human being, sublimating them to a category of lesser human or subhuman, who are even worse than animals. 

In any just society such a mistreatment of one group of persons is undoubtedly a criminal act and thus it can not be civil or private matter. It need not be necessarily sanctioned by Law of the Land as criminal to be considered criminal in nature. 

The Universal Declaration of Human rights of the United Nations categorically states that “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights”. Anything that violates the human dignity by any means be it mere words or action is a criminal act on humanity. 

In Indian society, Untouchables have been devoid of the self respect any individual human should deserve by virtue of them being human.

“It is an offence for a member of the Untouchable community to give high sounding names to their children. Their names be such as to indicate contempt.” ~Dr BR Ambedkar in Untouchables or the Children of India’s Ghetto

In traditional Hindu society, untouchables irrespective of their age are referred to by the Upper Castes by their Caste names with much disgust and contempt. 

Post Independence, as the Untouchables have benefited from the Affirmative Action policy of the State and broken the shackles of Caste by occupying public offices, land, education and employment the nature of atrocities have changed. The contempt and disgust in the minds of the Upper Castes has now turned into jealousy and hatred as traditionally all these things were denied access to the untouchables and the Upper Castes enjoyed their exploitation in full spirit. It should be noted here that any Caste which is not untouchable is Upper Caste to the Untouchables.

In the same judgement, the bench also observes that the alleged abuses were uttered solely on account of frustration and anger over the pending property dispute.

It should be noted here that traditionally as per the Hindu customary law Manusmriti the untouchables have not been allowed to hold property and even a property dispute between an untouchable and an Upper Caste might not be just a matter of civil dispute but may have casteist undertones. 

How just it is for the untouchables to keep listening to humiliating comments from Upper Castes and later justified as something that was not intentional but said in frustration?

Another observation of the Bench points to the fact that the judges in the Bench have a very poor understanding of Hindu society. The Bench observed that the accused is of relatively the same socio-economic position as the complainant.

The socio-economic backwardness of any caste which is not untouchable has no bearing on it’s contempt and animosity towards the untouchables. Even a destitute upper-caste may disrespect and violate the dignity of a well established, rich and educated untouchable with much impunity and no regrets. 

According to Christain Neuhäuser,  The humiliation of some members of a group is humiliating for the whole group, if:

1. The humiliation is directed against a collectively shared part of identity;

2. This shared part of identity is constitutive for the self-respect of the members of this group;

3. The humiliation is sanctioned on a social level and/or no appropriate measures against it are taken.

The Supreme Court has focused more on quashing the case citing promoting harmony and peace but there has been no attempt to sensitise the Upper Castes. The Indian state has no policy in place to teach young students about such issues and there is a complete silence on these issues snubbing them more often than not as contentious and pernicious to the larger society. 

The Supreme Court has not pondered upon rehabilitation of the people who are accused of humiliating SC ST. Why are there no mechanisms like correctional facilities which seeks to change the state of mind of the Upper Castes ? Why are there no reforms of the Upper Caste psyche? Why is there no sensitisation curriculum in the Indian education system that makes young students question what they are taught in their Upper Caste households? The absence of any such mechanisms makes me doubt whether the Supreme Court really wishes to promote harmony among the untouchables and the Upper Castes or just want to preserve the interest of the Upper Castes.

Hello, I am starting this blog as a parallel to Indian mainstream media which is built on caste networks and connections. I will be writing here on various topics which will be more often than not different perspectives on pressing issues in India. As it has been very hard for me to get a chance to feature in mainstream Indian media, I will make use of this blog to opine, critique, and comment on issues concerning India from an Anti Caste perspective.

Stay tuned for an intellectually exhilarating ride ahead.

This is an example post, originally published as part of Blogging University. Enroll in one of our ten programs, and start your blog right.

You’re going to publish a post today. Don’t worry about how your blog looks. Don’t worry if you haven’t given it a name yet, or you’re feeling overwhelmed. Just click the “New Post” button, and tell us why you’re here.

Why do this?

• Because it gives new readers context. What are you about? Why should they read your blog?
• Because it will help you focus your own ideas about your blog and what you’d like to do with it.

The post can be short or long, a personal intro to your life or a bloggy mission statement, a manifesto for the future or a simple outline of your the types of things you hope to publish.

To help you get started, here are a few questions:

• Why are you blogging publicly, rather than keeping a personal journal?
• What topics do you think you’ll write about?
• Who would you love to connect with via your blog?
• If you blog successfully throughout the next year, what would you hope to have accomplished?

You’re not locked into any of this; one of the wonderful things about blogs is how they constantly evolve as we learn, grow, and interact with one another — but it’s good to know where and why you started, and articulating your goals may just give you a few other post ideas.

Can’t think how to get started? Just write the first thing that pops into your head. Anne Lamott, author of a book on writing we love, says that you need to give yourself permission to write a “crappy first draft”. Anne makes a great point — just start writing, and worry about editing it later.

When you’re ready to publish, give your post three to five tags that describe your blog’s focus — writing, photography, fiction, parenting, food, cars, movies, sports, whatever. These tags will help others who care about your topics find you in the Reader. Make sure one of the tags is “zerotohero,” so other new bloggers can find you, too.